Ivermectin (The Drug They Don’t Want Us To Know About)
It was just recently that a friend of mine emailed me a link with the caption “The Ivermectin Story.” I clicked on the Youtube link only to find that the video had been taken down. After notifying my friend, he sent me a link to the same video on Vimeo. To my dismay, I found that the video had been taken down there as well!
Because curiosity is my greatest vice and after being rudely denied a potential lead I found myself even more intrigued by the drug Ivermectin. It wasn’t until I went on Bitchute that the video came up and thus began the rabbit trail of the Ivermectin story.
From their research on parasitic infections, William Campbell, Ōmura Satoshi, and Tu Youyou won the Nobel Prize for Physiology of Medicine in 2015. Together they developed a drug that could “treat millions of people at risk of contracting devastating diseases, such as onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, and also [playing] an important role in the control of intestinal helminth infections.” In the medical world, the drug is known as a “magic bullet” for global health.
On May 8, 2020, Peru approved the use of Ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19. In that time a doctoral journal found a significant reduction in case mortality and severity of patients. The journal explains that the biological mechanism of Ivermectin is “the same as that of antiviral antibodies generated by vaccines—binding to SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein, blocking viral attachment to host cells.” In the 24 states of Peru they found that “excess deaths at +30 days dropped by a population-weighted mean of 74%.”
Likewise, Senior Medical Scientist and Doctor, Leon Caly, who works within the Virus Identification Laboratory found that Ivermectin is “is an inhibitor of the causative virus SARS-CoV-2.”
In Australia’s Monash University, Dr. Kylie Wagstaff found that Ivermectin killed SARS-CoV-2 growing in cell culture within 48 hours.
An American Medical Journal reported that “Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that Ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no Ivermectin.”
These are just a few accounts of the growing list of scientists and doctors who report using Ivermectin to combat COVID-19. In fact, as of today the UK has approved clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19 patients with the Ivermectin drug.
If one wanders onto the official FDA website, however, you will find the headline “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” In their article, they describe Ivermectin as potentially dangerous and the studies to be inconclusive. The FDA declares there is much misinformation about the Ivermectin drug—a statement which seems to be echoed by all of our social media forums such as Youtube and Facebook, both of which have deleted all information about the drug. While positive results around the globe have been popping up about Ivermectin treatment, American authorities seem reluctant to share that knowledge. Ivermectin is relatively cheap. On drug distribution website honeybeehealth.com Ivermectin is listed at $65. A friend of mine received the drug with a $5 donation.
It might sound wild to us to imagine that such a simple drug could cure a worldwide pandemic. And even wilder that this drug is not readily administered to the public. The FDA warns that Ivermectin is not FDA approved for the use of COVID-19, but I will remind my reader that no COVID vaccine is officially approved either. In fact, it takes several years for any drug or vaccine to be approved, as it undergoes years of research and testing. The negative side effects of a defective drug may not show up immediately and could take years to reveal itself. Unlike the COVID vaccine, however, Ivermectin has undergone years of testing for the treatment of other diseases and has been considered highly effective—so effective that it won a Nobel Prize in Medicine.
On my month long journey of scavenging government websites, weeding through comments on social platforms for leads, reading medicine law documents, and watching hours of documentaries, I have continuously asked myself one question:
Why the fear mongering? Why the misinformation, or censoring of data? Why have pharmaceutical companies continued their efforts to no avail? Why have they been using dangerous treatments on cancer patients? Why would someone like Bill Gates care so much about a global pandemic, or the patent of a vaccine? Why so much effort to wire our lives to technology? And to what purpose?
Our government insists that the UFO’s seen in those videos are simply distorted images of planes, but I can’t help but wonder if there is a presence of something more sinister looming over all of us. Not aliens, but those of our own kind—business men and government officials, pharmaceutical companies, corporations, and media moguls. It is just 6 major corporations that own nearly all of our media: General Electric, News-Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS. And those companies own our news sources and technology, our internet, our data. It is through General Electric that women get mammogram screenings—a process which has been recently proclaimed as potentially hazardous with radiation. It is Disney that releases our favorite films like Captain America and Star Wars, and with those films they hold our imagination on lease. They speak to us tales of heroism and sacrifice, nationalism, and cooperation. They influence us on a regular basis, whether for good or bad. It is also Disney that produces toys through sweatshops in China with allegations of unhealthy work environments, low pay, and child labour. It is Viacom that owns channels like Nick Jr and MTV and it is their narrative of “educational” or “cool” that influences our children. It is Google that owns leading artificial intelligence company DeepMind and leading video platform Youtube. It is Facebook that owns Instagram and WhatsApp—some of the most popular apps ever used. Our pharmaceutical and health product companies donate an average of $4.7 billion for political lobbying. It is owners of Netflix and CNN and more that have close ties to major political figures. And those politicians create our laws.
We need to ask ourselves who is in control.
Imagine if the CEOs of those 6 media giants were connected. Imagine if they maintained a belief system and that belief system trickled down from them into their tv shows and movies, into their news stations and misinformation campaigns. We know that Apple lied to the public about the levels of radiation being emitted through their devices. We know that these global elites own fact checking websites. We know that Google has the power to put one article in front of us instead of another. We know that Facebook, Youtube, and Vimeo all deleted information about Ivermectin.
I sit at my table as I write this with a documentary on the drug cartel flashing in the background. “The boss wants everything. More money. The entire country,” a Mexican cartel member explains. Is it such a stretch to imagine that those who have extreme levels of wealth at their fingertips might want more and more of it?
These are powerful individuals with a value system that might conflict with those of us beneath them. And they will do whatever it takes to impose that belief system onto us. Technological advances is their value system. Predictability, algorithms, computing data, protocol, efficiency at all costs. Money is their value system. Futurism and control is their narrative. While it might appear to be benevolent when they present it, the global elite are becoming more and more omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. And while those like Bill Gates or companies like Monsanto promise us efficient data to yield crops and create healthier societies, the results may be catastrophic. One needs only to look at the Monsanto disaster in India to see the results they yield. And at this moment there are websites dedicated to COVID vaccine victims, which are being shut down such as covidvaccinevictims.com. It was there two weeks ago. Now it is gone.
On the VAERS official website, one needs only to scroll through the growing list of adverse effects due to the COVID vaccine to see that—intentional or not—this protocol may be dangerous, that they may be too optimistic about a questionable shot, that major companies like AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer and more may be too confident on something that has not yet proven itself safe.
Why don’t they want us to know about Ivermectin? Because it doesn’t fit their patents and their protocol. Maybe it won’t make enough money. Maybe the solution is too easy and too accessible. Maybe what they really want is dependency on their system. We want to believe that those in authority have our best interest in mind. Like a frog in a pot of boiling water, we might be blindly forfeiting our health. And we have yet to feel the repercussions of it.
Are the authorities our Sugar Daddy? Do they pimp us out? Do they control us and create in us an addiction to their poison? And to keep our allegiance, do they present us with the cure? Like the pimp that beholdens his prostitutes through addiction, guilt, fear, manipulation, and the ultimate display of authority and narcissism, the global elite are instilling in us that same level of dependency on them. They administer the poison and the cure. They actualize our beliefs. They allow the problem to grow so they can hand feed us the solution. They create in us dependency on their system. And they capitalize on our dependency.
They give. They take. They repeat. And we remain a while longer servants to their cause.